|
|
@ -6,66 +6,8 @@ |
|
|
|
* Chip Audette (OpenAudio) Feb 2017 |
|
|
|
* Chip Audette (OpenAudio) Feb 2017 |
|
|
|
* and of course, to PJRC for the Teensy and Teensy Audio Library |
|
|
|
* and of course, to PJRC for the Teensy and Teensy Audio Library |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* The development of the Controlled Envelope Single Side Band (CESSB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* was done by Dave Hershberger, W9GR. Many thanks to Dave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The following description is mostly taken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* from Frank, DD4WH and is on line at the GNU Radio site, ref: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* https://github-wiki-see.page/m/df8oe/UHSDR/wiki/Controlled-Envelope-Single-Sideband-CESSB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Controlled Envelope Single Sideband is an invention by Dave Hershberger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* W9GR with the aim to "allow your rig to output more average power while |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* keeping peak envelope power PEP the same". The increase in perceived |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* loudness can be up to 4dB without any audible increase in distortion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* and without making you sound "processed" (Hershberger 2014, 2016b). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The principle to achieve this is relatively simple. The process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* involves only audio baseband processing which can be done digitally in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* software without the need for modifications in the hardware or messing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* with the RF output of your rig. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Controlled Envelope Single Sideband can be produced using three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* processing blocks making up a complete CESSB system: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 1. An SSB modulator. This is implemented as a Weaver system to allow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* minimum (12 kHz) decimated sample rate with the output of I & Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* signals (a complex SSB signal). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2. A baseband envelope clipper. This takes the modulus of the I & Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* signals (also called the magnitude), which is sqrt(I * I + Q * Q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* and divides the I & Q signals by the modulus, IF the signal is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* larger than 1.0. If not, the signal remains untouched. After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* clipping, the signal is lowpass filtered with a linear phase FIR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* low pass filter with a stopband frequency of 3.0kHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 3. An overshoot controller . This does something similar as the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* envelope clipper: Again, the modulus is calculated (but now on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the basis of the current and two preceding and two subsequent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* samples). If the signals modulus is larger than 1 (clipping), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the signals I and Q are divided by the maximum of 1 or of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* (1.9 * signal). That means the clipping is overcompensated by 1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* which leads to a much better suppression of the overshoots from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the first two stages. Finally, the resulting signal is again |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* lowpass-filtered with a linear phase FIR filter with stopband |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* frequency of 3.0khz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* It is important that the sample rate is high enough so that the higher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* frequency components of the output of the modulator, clipper and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* overshoot controller do not alias back into the desired signal. Also |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* all the filters should be linear phase filters (FIR, not IIR). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* This CESSB system can reduce the overshoot of the SSB modulator from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 61% to 1.3%, meaning about 2.5 times higher perceived SSB output power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* (Hershberger 2014). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* References: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 1-Hershberger, D.L. (2014): Controlled Envelope Single Sideband. QEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* November/December 2014 pp3-13. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* http://www.arrl.org/files/file/QEX_Next_Issue/2014/Nov-Dec_2014/Hershberger_QEX_11_14.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 2-Hershberger, D.L. (2016a): External Processing for Controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Envelope Single Sideband. - QEX January/February 2016 pp9-12. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* http://www.arrl.org/files/file/QEX_Next_Issue/2016/January_February_2016/Hershberger_QEX_1_16.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 3-Hershberger, D.L. (2016b): Understanding Controlled Envelope Single |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Sideband. - QST February 2016 pp30-36. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4-Forum discussion on CESSB on the Flex-Radio forum, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* https://community.flexradio.com/discussion/6432965/cessb-questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Weaver Method of SSB: Note that this class includes a good umplementation |
|
|
|
* Weaver Method of SSB: Note that this class includes a good umplementation |
|
|
|
* of the Weaver method. To use this without invoking the CESSB corrections, |
|
|
|
* of the Weaver method. To use this without invoking the CESSB corrections, |
|
|
|
* just keep the input peak level below 1.0. One could disable CESSB by |
|
|
|
* just keep the input peak level below 1.0. One could disable CESSB by |
|
|
|