|
|
|
Flashing an attached Microcontroller
|
|
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to connect through the esp-link to a microcontroller use port 23. For example,
|
|
|
|
on linux you can use `nc esp-hostname 23` or `telnet esp-hostname 23`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that multiple connections to port 23 and 2323 can be made simultaneously. Esp-link will
|
|
|
|
intermix characters received on all these connections onto the serial TX and it will
|
|
|
|
broadcast incoming characters from the serial RX to all connections. Use with caution!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Flashing an attached AVR/Arduino
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are three options for reprogramming an attached AVR/Arduino microcontroller:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Use avrdude and point it at port 23 of esp-link. Esp-link automatically detects the programming
|
|
|
|
sequence and issues a reset to the AVR.
|
|
|
|
- Use avrdude and point it at port 2323 of esp-link. This is the same as port 23 except that the
|
|
|
|
autodectection is not used and the reset happens because port 2323 is used
|
|
|
|
- Use curl or a similar tool to HTTP POST the firmware to esp-link. This uses the built-in
|
|
|
|
programmer, which only works for AVRs/Arduinos with the optiboot bootloader (which is std).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To reprogram an Arduino / AVR microcontroller by pointing avrdude at port 23 or 2323 you
|
|
|
|
specify a serial port of the form `net:esp-link:23` in avrdude's -P option, where
|
|
|
|
`esp-link` is either the hostname of your esp-link or its IP address).
|
|
|
|
This is instead of specifying a serial port of the form /dev/ttyUSB0.
|
|
|
|
Esp-link detects that avrdude starts its connection with a flash synchronization sequence
|
|
|
|
and sends a reset to the AVR microcontroller so it can switch into flash programming mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note for Windows users: very recent avrdude versions on Windows support the -P option, while older
|
|
|
|
ones don't. See the second-to-last bullet in the
|
|
|
|
[avrdude 6.3 release notes]http://savannah.nongnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8461).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To reprogram using the HTTP POST method you need to first issue a POST to put optiboot into
|
|
|
|
programming mode: POST to `http://esp-link/pgm/sync`, this starts the process. Then check that
|
|
|
|
synchronization with optiboot has been achieved by issuing a GET to the same URL
|
|
|
|
(`http://esp-link/pgm/sync`). Repeat until you have sync (takes <500ms normally). Finally
|
|
|
|
issue a POST request to `http://esp-link/pgm/upload` with your hex file as POST data (raw,
|
|
|
|
not url-encoded or multipart-mime. Please look into the avrflash script for the curl command-line
|
|
|
|
details or use that script directly (`./avrflash esp-link.local my_sketch.hex`).
|
|
|
|
_Important_: after the initial sync request that resets the AVR you have 10 seconds to get to the
|
|
|
|
upload post or esp-link will time-out. So if you're manually entering curl commands have them
|
|
|
|
prepared so you can copy&paste!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beware of the baud rate, which you can set on the uC Console page. Sometimes you may be using
|
|
|
|
115200 baud in sketches but the bootloader may use 57600 baud. When you use port 23 or 2323 you
|
|
|
|
need to set the baud rate correctly. If you use the built-in programmer (HTTP POST method) then
|
|
|
|
esp-link will try the configured baud rate and also 9600, 57600, and 115200 baud, so it should
|
|
|
|
work even if you have the wrong baud rate configured...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When to use which method? If port 23 works then go with that. If you have trouble getting sync
|
|
|
|
or it craps out in the middle too often then try the built-in programmer with the HTTP POST.
|
|
|
|
If your AVR doesn't use optiboot then use port 2323 since esp-link may not recognize the programming
|
|
|
|
sequence and not issue a reset if you use port 23.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are having trouble with the built-in programmer and see something like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
# ./avrflash 192.168.3.104 blink.hex
|
|
|
|
Error checking sync: FAILED to SYNC: abandoned after timeout, got:
|
|
|
|
:\xF/\x00\xCj\xCz\xCJ\xCZ\xC\xAÜ\xC\xAä\xC\xAÜ\xC\xAä\xC\xBì\xC\xBô\xC\xBì\xC\xBô\xC\xAÜ\xC\xAä\xC
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the most likely cause is a baud rate mismatch and/or a bad connection from the esp8266 to the
|
|
|
|
AVRs reset line.
|
|
|
|
The baud rate used by esp-link is set on the uC Console web page and, as mentioned above, it will
|
|
|
|
automatically try 9600, 57600, and 115200 as well.
|
|
|
|
The above garbage characters are most likely due to optiboot timing out and starting the sketch
|
|
|
|
and then the sketch sending data at a different baud rate than configured into esp-link.
|
|
|
|
Note that sketches don't necessarily use the same baud rate as optiboot, so you may have the
|
|
|
|
correct baud rate configured but reset isn't functioning, or reset may be functioning but the
|
|
|
|
baud rate may be incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The output of a successful flash using the built-in programmer looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Success. 3098 bytes at 57600 baud in 0.8s, 3674B/s 63% efficient
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This says that the sketch comprises 3098 bytes of flash, was written in 0.8 seconds
|
|
|
|
(excludes the initial sync time) at 57600 baud,
|
|
|
|
and the 3098 bytes were flashed at a rate of 3674 bytes per second.
|
|
|
|
The efficiency measure is the ratio of the actual rate to the serial baud rate,
|
|
|
|
thus 3674/5760 = 0.63 (there are 10 baud per character).
|
|
|
|
The efficiency is not 100% because there is protocol overhead (such as sync, record type, and
|
|
|
|
length characters)
|
|
|
|
and there is dead time waiting for an ack or preparing the next record to be sent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Details of built-in AVR flash algorithm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The built-in flashing algorithm differs a bit from what avrdude does. The programming protocol
|
|
|
|
states that STK_GET_SYNC+CRC_EOP (0x30 0x20) should be sent to synchronize, but that works poorly
|
|
|
|
because the AVR's UART only buffers one character. This means that if STK_GET_SYNC+CRC_EOP is
|
|
|
|
sent twice there is a high chance that only the last character (CRC_EOP) is actually
|
|
|
|
received. If that is followed by another STK_GET_SYNC+CRC_EOP sequence then optiboot receives
|
|
|
|
CRC_EOP+STK_GET_SYNC+CRC_EOP which causes it to abort and run the old sketch. Ending up in that
|
|
|
|
situation is quite likely because optiboot initializes the UART as one of the first things, but
|
|
|
|
then goes off an flashes an LED for ~300ms during which it doesn't empty the UART.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at the optiboot code, the good news is that CRC_EOP+CRC_EOP can be used to get an initial
|
|
|
|
response without the overrun danger of the normal sync sequence and this is what esp-link does.
|
|
|
|
The programming sequence runs as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- esp-link sends a brief reset pulse (1ms)
|
|
|
|
- esp-link sends CRC_EOP+CRC_EOP ~50ms later
|
|
|
|
- esp-link sends CRC_EOP+CRC_EOP every ~70-80ms
|
|
|
|
- eventually optiboot responds with STK_INSYNC+STK_OK (0x14;0x10)
|
|
|
|
- esp-link sends one CRC_EOP to sort out the even/odd issue
|
|
|
|
- either optiboot responds with STK_INSYNC+STK_OK or nothing happens for 70-80ms, in which case
|
|
|
|
esp-link sends another CRC_EOP
|
|
|
|
- esp-link sends STK_GET_SYNC+CRC_EOP and optiboot responds with STK_INSYNC+STK_OK and we're in
|
|
|
|
sync now
|
|
|
|
- esp-link sends the next command (starts with 'u') and programming starts...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If no sync is achieved, esp-link changes baud rate and the whole thing starts over with a reset
|
|
|
|
pulse about 600ms, esp-link gives up after about 5 seconds and reports an error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Flashing an attached ARM processor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can reprogram NXP's LPC800-series and many other ARM processors as well by pointing your
|
|
|
|
programmer similarly at the esp-link's port 23. For example, if you are using
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/jeelabs/embello/tree/master/tools/uploader a command line like
|
|
|
|
`uploader -t -s -w esp-link:23 build/firmware.bin` does the trick.
|
|
|
|
The way it works is that the uploader uses telnet protocol escape sequences in order to
|
|
|
|
make esp-link issue the appropriate "ISP" and reset sequence to the microcontroller to start the
|
|
|
|
flash programming. If you use a different ARM programming tool it will work as well as long as
|
|
|
|
it starts the connection with the `?\r\n` synchronization sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Flashing an attached esp8266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__Flashing another esp8266 module is possible in theory but real-world attempts haveso far been
|
|
|
|
rather unsuccessful due to Wifi interference. This section is left here in case someone else
|
|
|
|
wants to dig in and find a solution.__
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use esp-link running on one esp8266 module to flash another esp8266 module,
|
|
|
|
however it is rather tricky! The problem is not electric, it is wifi interference.
|
|
|
|
The basic idea is to use some method to direct the esp8266 flash program to port 2323 of
|
|
|
|
esp-link. Using port 2323 with the appropriate wiring will cause the esp8266's reset and
|
|
|
|
gpio0 pins to be toggled such that the chip enters the flash programming mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One option for connecting the programmer with esp-link is to use my version of esptool.py
|
|
|
|
at http://github.com/tve/esptool, which supports specifying a URL instead of a port. Thus
|
|
|
|
instead of specifying something like `--port /dev/ttyUSB0` or `--port COM1` you specify
|
|
|
|
`--port socket://esp-link.local:2323`. Important: the baud rate specified on the esptool.py
|
|
|
|
command-line is irrelevant as the baud rate used by esp-link will be the one set in the
|
|
|
|
uC console page. Fortunately the esp8266 bootloader does auto-baud detection. (Setting the
|
|
|
|
baud rate to 115200 is recommended.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another option is to use a serial-to-tcp port forwarding driver and point that to port 2323
|
|
|
|
of esp-link. On windows users have reported success with
|
|
|
|
http://www.hw-group.com/products/hw_vsp/hw_vsp2_en.html[HW Virtual Serial Port]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now to the interference problem: once the attached esp8266 is reset it
|
|
|
|
starts outputting its 26Mhz clock on gpio0, which needs to be attached to
|
|
|
|
the esp8266 running esp-link (since it needs to drive gpio0 low during
|
|
|
|
the reset to enter flash mode). This 26Mhz signal on gpio0 causes a
|
|
|
|
significant amount of radio interference with the result that the esp8266
|
|
|
|
running esp-link has trouble receiving Wifi packets. You can observe this
|
|
|
|
by running a ping to esp-link in another window: as soon as the target
|
|
|
|
esp8266 is reset, the pings become very slow or stop altogetehr. As soon
|
|
|
|
as you remove power to the attached esp8266 the pings resume beautifully.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To try and get the interference under control, try some of the following:
|
|
|
|
add a series 100ohm resistor and 100pf capacitor to ground as close to
|
|
|
|
the gpio0 pin as possible (basically a low pass filter); and/or pass
|
|
|
|
the cable connecting the two esp8266's through a ferrite bead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Debug log
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The esp-link web UI can display the esp-link debug log (os_printf statements in the code). This
|
|
|
|
is handy but sometimes not sufficient. Esp-link also prints the debug info to the UART where
|
|
|
|
it is sometimes more convenient and sometimes less... For this reason three UART debug log
|
|
|
|
modes are supported that can be set in the web UI (and the mode is saved in flash):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- auto: the UART log starts enabled at boot using uart0 and disables itself when esp-link
|
|
|
|
associates with an AP. It re-enables itself if the association is lost.
|
|
|
|
- off: the UART log is always off
|
|
|
|
- on0: the UART log is always on using uart0
|
|
|
|
- on1: the UART log is always on using uart1 (gpio2 pin)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that even if the UART log is always off the ROM prints to uart0 whenever the
|
|
|
|
esp8266 comes out of reset. This cannot be disabled.
|